Radey H. Mohammad v. Ronald Angelone

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6948
RADEY H. MOHAMMAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD ANGELONE; JAMES JENKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-819-3)
Submitted: December 10, 2002 Decided: February 10, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew P. Geary, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jerry W.
Kilgore, Attorney General, Richard C. Vorhis, Assistant Attorney
General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Radey H. Mohammad appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Mohammad v. Angelone, No. CA-01-819-3 (E.D. Va.
May 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --