The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6939•Joshua Bernard Johns v. Nancy Matthew
02-6939Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6939
JOSHUA BERNARD JOHNS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NANCY MATTHEW; M. LOVE; MR. TREND; SERGEANT
TUCKER; SERGEANT BARNETT; CAPTAIN HILL; E. B.
WALKER; MAJOR VAUGHN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-342-AM)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 26, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Bernard Johns, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Bernard Johns appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint for
failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johns v.
Matthew, No. CA-02-342-AM (E.D. Va. May 30, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.