The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6897•Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr v. MR. MOORE, Counselor
02-6897Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 10, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6897
JESSIE BENJAMIN KINDLEY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. MOORE, Counselor; J.V. BEALE, Warden;
WAYNE BROWN, Assistant Warden of Operations;
MRS. JOYNER, Business Manager; MR. WRIGHT,
Assistant at Warden of Programs; MR. ROSE,
Assistant at Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-366-2)
Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Kindley’s motion to
present interrogatories, deny his motion for production of
documents, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See Kindley v. Moore, No. CA-02-366-2 (E.D. Va. May 30,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.