The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6896•Elbert Smith, Jr v. CAROLYN CROSS, Warden, L.V.C.C
02-6896Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6896
ELBERT SMITH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAROLYN CROSS, Warden, L.V.C.C.; CHIEF
SULLIVAN, Chief of Security, L.V.C.C.;
SERGEANT YATES, Correction Officer, L.V.C.C.;
SERGEANT REED, Correction Officer, L.V.C.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-272-2)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 6, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elbert Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Smith v. Cross, No. CA-02-272-2 (E.D. Va. May
13, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.