Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6878
HUBERT LYTLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-02-326-3)
Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hubert Lytle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hubert Lytle appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Lytle v. Brooks, No. CA-02-326-3 (E.D. Va. June 4, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
