Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

02-6856Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6856
MALCOM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward
Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER;
THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; C. LEAKS, Dietary
Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.
(CA-02-138)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 6, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals from the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional
Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-02-138 (D. Md. May 1, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.