The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6849•Freddy L. Wambach v. North Carolina Department of Revenue
02-6849Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6849
FREDDY L. WAMBACH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; MICHAEL
F. EASLEY; ROY COOPER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-01-972-1)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddy L. Wambach, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Freddy L. Wambach, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the
district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp.
2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Wambach v. North Carolina
Dep’t of Revenue, No. CA-01-972-1 (M.D.N.C. May 1, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.