The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6829•United States of America v. Derrick Favonta Askew
02-6829Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6829
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DERRICK FAVONTA ASKEW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CR-99-38)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 8, 2002
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Favonta Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Favonta Askew seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning
of the district court that Askew has not made a substantial showing
of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v.
Askew, No. CR-99-38 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.