The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6826•United States of America v. Carvel E. Benson, a/k/a Sam, a/k/a Gene
02-6826Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6826
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CARVEL E. BENSON, a/k/a Sam, a/k/a Gene,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-89-136-2)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carvel E. Benson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carvel E. Benson appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Benson, No. CA-89-136-2
(E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2002). Benson’s motion for appointment of
counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.