The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6709•James Calhoun-El v. Thomas Randy Corcoran
02-6709Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 10, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6709
JAMES CALHOUN-EL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS RANDY CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR
THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-02-
1114-L)
Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Calhoun-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See Calhoun-El v. Corcoran, No. CA-02-1114-L (D.
Md. filed Apr. 19, 2002, entered Apr. 23, 2002). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.