The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6684•United States of America v. Camille Ford
02-6684Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6684
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CAMILLE FORD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-94-163-18-2)
Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 27, 2002
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Camille Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her
motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Ford, No. CR-94-163-18-2 (E.D. Va., filed Apr. 10,
2002; entered Apr. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.