The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6681•Hugo Escobar v. DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden
02-6681Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6681
HUGO ESCOBAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden; G. MORGAN,
Assistant Warden; G. H. PUGH, Chief Case
Worker,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-132-2)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 19, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugo Escobar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hugo Escobar appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Escobar v. Garraghty, No. CA-02-132-2 (E.D. Va.
Apr. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.