The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6678•Robert Joseph King v. Captain Barnes
02-6678Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6678
ROBERT JOSEPH KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAPTAIN BARNES; CAPTAIN ENGLISH; VINCENT
CALLOWAY, Major; M. RICHARD FRAGALA; GEORGES
C. BENJAMIN, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
01-3830-DKC)
Submitted: June 19, 2002 Decided: July 1, 2002
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Joseph King, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph O’Brien, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Joseph King appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See King v. Barnes, No. CA-01-3830-DKC (D. Md. Mar.
25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.