The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6664•Gene M. Duncan v. GERALDINE MIRO, Warden
02-6664Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6664
GENE M. DUNCAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,
South Carolina Attorney General,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-01-2410-2-23)
Submitted: September 30, 2002 Decided: October 23, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gene M. Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Tracey Colton Green, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gene M. Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Miro,
No. CA-01-2410-2-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.