The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6661•Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr v. United States of America
02-6661Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6661
LENZIE LEE MURRAY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01-
2188-AMD)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 1, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.
P. 41(e) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Murray v. United States, No. CA-01-2188-AMD (D. Md. filed Feb. 13,
2002 & entered Feb. 14, 2002; filed Feb. 19, 2002 & entered Feb.
20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.