The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6620•Linwood Earl Chandler v. A. D. NETHERLAND, Acting Captain
02-6620Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6620
LINWOOD EARL CHANDLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. D. NETHERLAND, Acting Captain; W. M. PENN,
Lieutenant; DAVID BARNES, Doctor; L. COLLINS,
Inmate Adjustment Hearing Officer; ALTON
BASKERVILLE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-1911)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood Earl Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Linwood Earl Chandler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and
agree that Chandler’s complaint fails to state a claim.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Chandler v. Netherland, No. CA-01-1911 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12,
2002). We also deny Chandler’s motion for sanctions. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.