The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6606•William M. Bryson, Jr v. MARK C. MOORE, Assistant United States Attorney
02-6606Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6606
WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARK C. MOORE, Assistant United States
Attorney; REGAN PENDLETON, Assistant United
States Attorney; MARTIN BROWN, Special Agent
for the FBI; ROBERT SCOTT, Special Agent of
the FBI; JANET BROWN, Internal Revenue Service
Agent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-82-6-20AK)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Bryson v. Moore, No. CA-02-82-6-20AK (D.S.C.
filed Feb. 22, 2002; entered Feb. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.