The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6582•Carlos Eugene Kipp v. West Virginia Department of Corrections
02-6582Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6582
CARLOS EUGENE KIPP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-102-2)
Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 27, 2002
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos Eugene Kipp, Appellant Pro Se. Daynus Jividen, Charles
Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Eugene Kipp seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. Kipp v. West Virginia Dep’t of
Corrections, No. CA-99-102-2 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.