The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6574•United States of America v. Robert Dion Savoy
02-6574Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 12, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6574
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT DION SAVOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CR-90-398-A, CA-94-1179-AM)
Submitted: August 26, 2002 Decided: September 12, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Dion Savoy, Appellant Pro Se. Helen F. Fahey, United States
Attorney, Stephanie Evans, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* Although this motion was filed in the district court
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6), it essentially sought to
preserve Savoy’s claims raised in his underlying motion to vacate,
set aside, or correct his sentence.
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Dion Savoy seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion for relief from judgment in which he challenged
the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. * We have reviewed
the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that
Savoy has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. See United States v. Savoy, Nos. CR-90-398-A;
CA-94-1179-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c) (2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.