United States of America v. Edward R. Butler

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6563
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDWARD R. BUTLER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.
(CR-97-146-S, CA-02-561-S)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward R. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward R. Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000),
and denying his motions for reconsideration and for recusal. We
have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the
district court that Butler has not made a substantial showing of
the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Butler,
Nos. CR-97-146-S; CA-02-561-S (D. Md. Feb. 22, 2002; Mar. 5 2002;
Mar. 12, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --