Curtis Nixon v. WOLFE, Officer

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6558
CURTIS NIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WOLFE, Officer,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-192)
Submitted: July 31, 2002 Decided: August 23, 2002
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Nixon, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Bayard Aycock, III,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Nixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Nixon v. Wolfe, No. CA-00-192 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --