Danny Felix v. Lindy Pendergrass

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6557
DANNY FELIX,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
LINDY PENDERGRASS; UNITED STATES PAROLE
COMMISSION,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-01-449-1)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 12, 2002
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Felix, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* We note Felix’s objections to the report of the magistrate
judge were timely under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2000). We have
considered the objections and the points raised in Felix’s informal
brief to this court in reaching our decision.
2
PER CURIAM:
Danny Felix appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and conclude that Felix has
not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.* See Felix v. Pendergrass, No. CA-01-449-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar.
25, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --