The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6545•United States of America v. Timothy Antonio Jones, a/k/a Tony Smith
02-6545Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 12, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6545
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY ANTONIO JONES, a/k/a Tony Smith,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CR-98-148, CA-01-18-3)
Submitted: August 13, 2002 Decided: September 12, 2002
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Antonio Jones, Appellant Pro Se. S. David Schiller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Antonio Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-98-148; CA-01-18-3
(E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.