The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6531•United States of America v. Bradley Dean Bidgood, a/k/a Brad
02-6531Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6531
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRADLEY DEAN BIDGOOD, a/k/a Brad,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-32)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 19, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Dean Bidgood, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bradley Dean Bidgood appeals the district court’s margin order
denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Bidgood, No. CR-95-32 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.