The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6507•United States of America v. Jonathan Edwards
02-6507Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6507
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN EDWARDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-133-BO)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Edwards appeals from the district’s order denying his
“Motion to Reopen,” in which he asserts that he should not have
been sentenced as an armed career criminal for his 1993 conviction
under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000). Edwards failed to raise this issue
in his direct criminal appeal. Moreover, the time for seeking post-
conviction relief has long since expired. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).
Consequently, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.