The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6458•United States of America v. Milton Keith James
02-6458Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6458
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MILTON KEITH JAMES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-
88-70-K, CA-01-1904-JFM)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton Keith James, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Milton Keith James seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. James, Nos. CR-88-70-K; CA-01-1904-JFM (D. Md. filed July
16, 2001; Jan. 7, 2002 & entered Jan. 8, 2002). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.