The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6453•Michael A. Williams v. Jerry Haney
02-6453Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 8, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6453
MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JERRY HANEY; WILLIAM S. HAINES, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-74-2)
Submitted: June 17, 2002 Decided: July 8, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying
relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Williams v. Haney, No. CA-01-74-2
(N.D.W. Va. Feb. 25, 2002). We deny Williams’ motions requesting
Rule 44 inquiries and to stay this case. Finally, we dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.