The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6395•Curtis R. Davy v. U.s. Immigration & Naturalization Service
02-6395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6395
CURTIS R. DAVY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-4033-6-13AK)
Submitted: October 28, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis R. Davy, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis R. Davy appeals the district court’s order granting the
Respondents’ motion to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court, see Davy v. INS, No. CA-01-4033-6-
13AK (D.S.C. filed Jan. 4, 2002 & entered Jan. 8, 2002), and on the
reasoning of our recent decision in Chambers v. Reno, F.3d ,
2002 WL 31301183 (4th Cir. Oct. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.