In re: El Shaddai Masada

02-6361Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 8, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6361
In Re: EL SHADDAI MASADA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-00-2887-7-17BG)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 8, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
El Shaddai Masada, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
El Shaddai Masada filed this mandamus petition seeking to
compel the district court to expedite its consideration of his 42
U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action. Mandamus is a drastic
remedy only to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re
Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is
available only when the petitioner has a clear and indisputable
right to the relief sought and there are no other adequate means
for obtaining the requested relief. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon,
Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980); Beard, 811 F.2d at 826. Masada has
failed to make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief.
Our review of the district court docket sheet discloses that there
has been no undue delay in Masada’s § 1983 action.
We grant Masada’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We
deny Masada’s motions for sanctions and to consolidate this case
with another mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.