The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6354•United States of America v. Charlie Patterson Taylor
02-6354Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 9, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6354
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLIE PATTERSON TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-99-99)
Submitted: July 30, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlie Patterson Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,
Richard Barton Campbell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles P. Taylor appeals from the district court’s orders
denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Taylor, No. CR-99-99 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2001; Jan. 22, 2002); see
United States v. Emmanuel, 288 F.3d 644, 649 (4th Cir. 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.