The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6318•United States of America v. Tyrone E. Freeman
02-6318Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6318
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TYRONE E. FREEMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-98-433-AW, CA-01-1985-AW)
Submitted: May 29, 2002 Decided: June 11, 2002
Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone E. Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone E. Freeman seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)
and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Freeman, Nos. CR-98-433-AW; CA-
01-1985-AW (D. Md. Oct. 29, 2001 & Jan. 2, 2002). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.