The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6307•Derek Marquis Fleming v. KEITH E. OLSON, Warden, F.C.I. Beckley
02-6307Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6307
DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
KEITH E. OLSON, Warden, F.C.I. Beckley,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CA-97-660-5)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek Marquis Fleming appeals the district court’s orders (1)
denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6), to vacate
the court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994)
petition and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Fleming v. Olson, No. CA-97-660-5 (S.D.W. Va. Jan.
4, 2002; Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.