The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6237•David Lawrence Dixon v. PAUL RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner of Corrections
02-6237Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6237
DAVID LAWRENCE DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner of Corrections;
HOWARD H. PAINTER, Warden of Mount Olive
Correctional Complex,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CA-01-467-5)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Lawrence Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Daynus Jividen, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Lawrence Dixon appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Dixon v. Rubenstein, No. CA-01-467-5
(S.D.W. Va. Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.