United States of America v. George Bennett

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6235
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE BENNETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CR-94-189)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Bennett styled the motion for relief as “specific
performance.”
2
PER CURIAM:
George Bennett appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for a reduction of sentence for substantial assistance under
Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). * We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Bennett, No. CR-94-189 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --