James Edward Dawkins v. STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6228
JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-10-5-BO)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Dawkins appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Dawkins v. Dewalt, No. CA-02-10-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 22, 2002). We deny Dawkins’ motion for the appointment of
counsel at Government expense and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --