The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6227•United States of America v. Thomas B. Foster
02-6227Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6227
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
THOMAS B. FOSTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-96-5-MU, CA-00-60-3-1-MU)
Submitted: June 19, 2002 Decided: June 28, 2002
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas B. Foster appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2001), and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Foster, Nos. CR-96-5-MU; CA-00-60-3-1-MU
(W.D.N.C. June 1, 2000; filed July 5, 2000 & entered July 11,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.