The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6217•John Luhon I, a/k/a Alvon Allen Thomas v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General
02-6217Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 26, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6217
JOHN LUHON I, a/k/a Alvon Allen Thomas,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-7)
Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Luhon I, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Luhon I appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny I’s motion for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See I v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-7
(E.D. Va. filed Jan. 14, 2002; entered Jan. 15, 2002). We have
previously granted I’s motion to amend the caption to reflect his
name change for purposes of this appeal. I has now filed a motion
to compel the Bureau of Prisons to change his name from Alvon Allen
Thomas to John Luhon I. We deny this motion without prejudice to
his right to move the district court to compel recognition of his
name change. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.