The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6185•Darryl Green v. PATRICK CONROY, Warden
02-6185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6185
DARRYL GREEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICK CONROY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
02-92-DKC)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and
dismissing without prejudice the complaint insofar as if could be
construed as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Green v. Conroy, No. CA-02-92-DKC (D.
Md. Jan. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.