The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6135•Joseph Hugo Gibbs v. State of South Carolina
02-6135Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6135
JOSEPH HUGO GIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; GARY MAYNARD,
Director of SCDC; WILLIAM D. CATOE, former
Director of SCDC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-3646-3-10BC)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Hugo Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Hugo Gibbs appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint and
denying his motions for reconsideration and to amend the judgment
order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Gibbs v. South Carolina, No. CA-01-3646-3-10BC
(D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2001; filed Nov. 30, 2001 & entered Dec. 3, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.