The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6099•Leon James Ridings v. FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, via Steve Schwalb, Chief Operating Officer
02-6099Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6099
LEON JAMES RIDINGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, via
Steve Schwalb, Chief Operating Officer; KENT
MARTIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-236-5-BO)
Submitted: April 11, 2002 Decided: April 23, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon James Ridings, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Leon James Ridings appeals from the district court’s order
denying relief on his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Ridings v. Federal Prison
Indus., Inc., No. CA-00-236-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 26, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.