The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6073•Nathan Fisher v. Greenville County Sheriff’s Office
02-6073Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 15, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6073
NATHAN FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; E. E.
WARE, Officer #515; T. D. HAMPTON, Officer; K.
D. DURHAM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-3473-2-08)
Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 15, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN,
HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Fisher appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Fisher v. Greenville County Sheriff’s Office, No. CA-99-3473-2-08
(D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.