The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6060•United States of America v. Kyle Anton Davis
02-6060Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 16, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6060
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KYLE ANTON DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CR-95-122, CA-00-410)
Submitted: April 3, 2002 Decided: April 16, 2002
Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kyle Anton Davis, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kyle Anton Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s orders:
(1) dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion; (2)
denying his motion for summary judgment and motion for
reconsideration; and (3) denying his motion alleging bias pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 144 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Davis, Nos. CR-95-122; CA-00-410 (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, Dec. 1 &
Dec. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.