Juan Tapanes v. Art Beeler

02-6027Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6027
JUAN TAPANES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ART BEELER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-929-5-BO)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Tapanes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Juan Tapanes appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Tapanes v. Beeler, No. CA-01-929-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.