The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6012•Gregory Oliver Rustin v. WILLIAM TORRES, Doctor
02-6012Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6012
GREGORY OLIVER RUSTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM TORRES, Doctor; COUNTY OF HENRICO
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-441-3)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 31, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Oliver Rustin, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis,
III, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Jacqueline Guess
Epps, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Oliver Rustin appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Rustin v. Torres, No. CA-01-441-3
(E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.