The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-4420•United States of America v. Widney Trevor Dinnall
02-4420Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-4420
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WIDNEY TREVOR DINNALL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-
98-946-DSW)
Submitted: October 23, 2002 Decided: November 22, 2002
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Widney Trevor Dinnall, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Widney Trevor Dinnall appeals the district court’s fourth
order forfeiting substitute assets. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Dinnall, No. CR-98-946-
DWS (D.S.C. filed May 1, 2002; entered May 2, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.