The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2423•Delicia Ulrich Yanghat Mboumba v. Bernal, Assistant Director, Kurt B. Larson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED…
02-2423Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2423
DELICIA ULRICH YANGHAT MBOUMBA,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A75-840-539)
Submitted: August 19, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yurika S. Cooper, IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, P.C., Washington, D.C.,
for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney
General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Kurt B. Larson,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Delicia Ulrich Yanghat Mboumba, a native and citizen of the
Republic of Congo, petitions for review of a final order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s
denial of asylum and withholding of removal.
Mboumba takes issue with the finding that she failed meet her
statutory burden and establish her eligibility for the relief
sought. Upon our review, we find the record supports the denial of
relief. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4) (2000); see Matter of Y-B-, 21 I. &
N. Dec. 1136, 1139 (BIA 1998); Matter of S-M-J-, 21 I. & N. Dec.
722, 724-26 (BIA 1997).
We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.