The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2413•Norman L. Staton, Jr v. Internal Revenue Service
02-2413Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2413
NORMAN L. STATON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TAXATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.
(CA-02-26-6)
Submitted: February 11, 2003 Decided: February 20, 2003
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman L. Staton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laurie Allyn Snyder,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; John P.
Josephs, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Norman L. Staton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Staton v. IRS, No. CA-02-26-6 (W.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.