Daryl Smith v. Maryland State Police

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2397
DARYL SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND STATE POLICE; DAVID B. MITCHELL,
Secretary of the Department of State Police;
E. J. KRICKLER; HECTOR VENTO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-1716-WMN)
Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, Assistant
Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Daryl Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons state by the district court. See Smith v. Maryland State
Police, No. CA-02-1716-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 8 and Dec. 10, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --