The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2372•Tracy Woody v. Online Exchange, Incorporated
02-2372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2372
TRACY WOODY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ONLINE EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-185-BO)
Submitted: April 29, 2003 Decided: June 2, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy Woody, Appellant Pro Se. James Benjamin Trachtman, KILPATRICK
STOCKTON, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tracy Woody appeals the district court’s order granting
Appellee Online Exchange, Inc.’s motion to dismiss for improper
venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Woody v. Online
Exchange, Inc., No. CA-02-185-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). We also
deny Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.