The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2357•Rose M. O’neal v. United States of America
02-2357Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2357
ROSE M. O’NEAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF THE
ARMY; TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER; CHAMPUS,
Department of Defense,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-02-870-A)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 22, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rose M. O’Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rose M. O’Neal appeals the district court’s judgment
dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See O’Neal v. United States,
CA-02-870-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.